Founding cohort now forming. Join or follow the seminars.

← Documents

Charter

What the network is, who belongs to it, how it is run, and how this document changes.

This is the founding document of the network: what it is, who belongs to it, who coordinates it, how the seminars run, and how the document is amended. It is a draft until the founding labs ratify it; see the note at the end.

1. Name

English is the default working language, so that researchers across institutions can take part in the same events. Names may be listed in Chinese and English. Teaching material may be contributed in either language when clearly labelled.

2. Purpose

3. What the network is and is not

The network is an agreement among labs. It is not a legal entity, a registered society or a 学会. It has no membership fee, no president and no board, and owns nothing except the files in its public repository. Registering a society in Hong Kong or an association on the mainland carries legal duties the group does not want yet.

Formalisation clause. If the network ever needs a legal form, the decision is taken openly: proposed as a pull request against this charter, open for comment for at least 30 days, agreed by consensus of the coordinators and a majority of member labs, and recorded in the amendment log. Nobody may register an entity in the network’s name without this.

4. Membership

The unit of membership is the lab: a group led by a principal investigator at a university, institute or hospital. Individuals do not join. Students and postdocs take part as audience through the calendar feed and the announcement list; there is nothing to apply for.

“Computational and cognitive neuroscience” is read broadly: computational modelling of brain and behaviour; systems and cognitive neuroscience using computational methods; neuroAI and brain-inspired computing; and neural data science.

Membership is light but not passive. A member lab is expected to take part in network activities and to take its turn in the seminar rotation, because the network has no staff and no budget: what it does, member labs do. There is no minimum attendance requirement, and a quiet year is not by itself grounds for removal, though the annual confirmation of an entry still has to be answered; a lab leaves the roster only as section 8 describes, or under the code of conduct.

No lab is expected to share unpublished data, research ideas, funding or other confidential material with the network or with another member lab. What the network asks for is time and attention. The member lab guidelines set out what taking part looks like in practice.

Labs apply through the “[Lab]” issue form, linked from the join page. Intake is automatic; approval is human. A coordinator reviews every application, and nothing appears on the site until the pull request is merged, because the roster is only a credential if it is curated. The entry lists the PI, lab name, institution and city, keywords, links and, with permission, a photo that is displayed on the network’s channels only.

5. Coordinators

The network is run by three to seven coordinators, one per participating institution where possible.

Until the founding labs confirm the first coordinators, one interim coordinator, Xiangbin Teng (滕相斌) of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, maintains the site and repository. The current list is on the About page.

6. Seminar series

7. Other activities

8. Delisting and annual refresh

A lab is removed when its PI asks or leaves the region; in the second case affiliate status is offered. Each year the coordinators ask every listed lab to confirm its entry. Entries unconfirmed after two reminders are removed at the next refresh.

Everything the network publishes is a file in a public repository, and every change is a pull request anyone can read. Data is hosted on GitHub, outside mainland China. Labs publish their entries voluntarily, through a consent box on the form. Text content is CC BY 4.0; code is MIT; photographs are displayed with permission and are not licensed for reuse. What is collected, how photos are processed and how a lab withdraws are described in Privacy and consent, which reads Hong Kong PDPO and mainland PIPL in plain terms. Neither that document nor this one is legal advice.

10. Amendments

Anyone may propose an amendment as a pull request against this file. It stays open for comment for at least 14 days, announced on the list, and is merged on the coordinators’ consensus, with a simple majority as fallback. Typo and link fixes skip the comment period.


Draft for ratification by the founding labs. Adopted: not yet.

Amendment log

Date Change Pull request
(none yet)

Source: docs/charter.md. Propose a change by pull request.